Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 S.W.2d 257 - Perry v. Perry

Perry v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2008

1 district · 15 state decisions

701972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Swon v. Huddleston · Lolordo v. Lacy · Boyle v. Crimm · Fendler v. Roy · Anison v. Rice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . . where a defaulting trustee has first commingled the trust funds with his own and then paid them out in satisfaction of his own debts, it will be presumed that the payment was made from his own contribution to the commingled fund, `and not out of the trust money,' so that whatever is left is the money for which he is accountable in his fiduciary capacity. Lolordo v. Lacy, 337 Mo. 1097 , 88 S. W.2d 353, 358 ; Cross v. Cross, 362 Mo. 1098 , 246 S.W.2d 801, 803 ." Perry v. Perry, 484 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Mo.1972).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is a settled maxim that equity, once having acquired jurisdiction of a cause, will not relinquish it without doing full and effective justice between the parties, even though, to right the wrong complained of, resort must be had to a remedy within the traditional province of law, as by a judgment for money by way of restitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.