United States v. Rosner’s Empirical Analysis
485 F.2d 1213 · 1973
Citation profile
135 federal appellate · 8 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 186 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Weatherford v. Bursey (1977), Simer v. Rios (1981)
135 federal appellate · 8 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1791 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 24 (§ 241 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Katz v. United States · Massiah v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he essence of the Sixth Amendment right is, indeed, privacy of communication with counsel.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Rosner said he wanted 3500 material. Rosner told Leuci that he understood that there were four witnesses in the case and that ‘two were good and two are bad,’ and that he ‘would like to find out what two are good and what two aren’t good.’ Leuci told Rosner that although his contact had not yet established a price for the information Rosner wanted, Leuci ‘would appreciate it if something were done’ for his ‘contact’ in the United States Attorney’s office, ‘as soon as possible.’ Rosner and DeStefano stepped away from the table and Leuci saw Rosner pass DeStefano some money. When they returned to the table DeStefano passed Leuci $400 under the table.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We conclude, however, that a finding of unlawful intrusion must precede the determination of its consequences. We can make no such finding here. Judge Bauman, after hearing the witnesses, found to the contrary .... [W]e are convinced, on our own review of the evidence, that the Government has sustained its contention beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.