Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

485 F.2d 1237

Docket No. 73-1414.

Westmoreland v. Laird

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 3, 1973.

Decided Nov. 8, 1973.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-11-08

2 counsel of record

Relies on Allied Bitumens, Inc. v. United States · 364 F. Supp. 948 - Westmoreland v. Laird

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1973-11-08

¶1Thomas F. Loflin, III, Durham, N. C. (Loflin, Anderson, Loflin & Goldsmith, and Ann F. Loflin, Durham, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

¶2Carl L. Tilghman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Thomas P. McNamara, U. S. Atty., on brief, for appellees.

¶3Before BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CRAVEN and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

¶4*1238PER CURIAM:

¶5Complaining that she was illegally discharged from her employment with the United States in the Carolina Area Support Center Army-Air Force Exchange Service at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, because of her race and denial of procedural due process, Hattie T. Westmoreland, a Negro, sued for reinstatement and recovery of accrued but unpaid wages. From the judgment of the District Court dismissing the action for her failure to substantiate her claim in fact or in law, she appeals.

¶6Upon consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel, on brief and orally, this court preceiving no error in the District Court’s findings of fact or conclusions of law, now affirms the judgment on review, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge. Westmoreland v. Laird et al, 364 F.Supp. 948 (1973).

¶7Affirmed.

/485/f2d/1237 · .json · Public domain