Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 F.2d 176 - Zimmerer v. Spencer

Zimmerer v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

485 F.2d 176 · 1973

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
July 1993
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1993 · most notably Carey v. Piphus (1978), Hostrop v. Board of Junior College District No. 515 (1975)

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

380197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Perry v. Sindermann · William C. Ferguson v. Alvin I. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it, he must have more than an unilateral expectation of it, he must, instead, have a legitimate claim to it * * *» * -* * -X- * * “Property interests, of course, were not created by the Constitution. Rather they were created and their dimensions were defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law—rules or understandings that secure certain benefits and that support claims of entitlement to those benefits * * See Roth, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.