Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 F.2d 240 - Johnson v. United States

Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

485 F.2d 240 · 1973

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
August 1990
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 1990 · most notably Farrow v. United States (1978), Barker v. United States (1978)

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

250197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Tucker · Kercheval v. United States · Somerville v. Illinois · Jacobs v. United States · Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was perfunctory, in bad faith, a sham, a pretense or without adequate opportunity for conference or preparation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Unless it appears that the court acted unjustly or unfairly, there is no abuse of discretion,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.