Green v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
485 F.2d 242 · 1973
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2002 · most notably National Welfare Rights Organization v. Mathews (1976), Allison v. K
11 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 1102 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Wilczynski v. Harder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A State plan for aid and services to needy families with children must ... (7) except as may be otherwise provided in [section 402(a)(8)], provide that the State agency shall, in determining need, take into consideration any other income and resources of any child or relative claiming aid to families with dependent children, or of any other individual (living in the same home as such child and relative) whose needs the State determines should be considered in determining the need of the child or relative claiming such aid, as well as any expenses reasonably attributable to the earning of any such income;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only such net income as is actually available for current use on a regular basis will be considered and only currently available resources will be considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.