United States v. Koonce’s Empirical Analysis
485 F.2d 374 · 1973
Citation profile
74 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Giordano (1974), Kungys v. United States (1988)
74 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 26 U.S.C. § 6531
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Bolling v. Sharpe · Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Williamson · Eisenstadt v. Baird
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“False declarations before grand jury or court (a) Whoever under oath in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration * * * shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence““(1) only a probability of criminal conduct need be shown, (2) standards less rigorous than rules of evidence determine sufficiency (3) common sense controls and (4) ‘great deference’ should be shown by the courts to a magistrate’s determination of probable cause.” McCreary v. Sigler, 406 F.2d 1264, 1268 (8th Cir. 1969); See also, U. S. v. Koonce, 485 F.2d 374, 380 (8th Cir. 1973).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he question of materiality is one of law for the courts to decide. The proper determination of the question, however, is essentially a factual matter for the trial judge to determine. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.