Royal Electrotype Corporation Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
485 F.2d 394 · 1973
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc. (1978), Brushwood v. Citizens Bank (1981)
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate J Bosch Second National Bank of New Haven · Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc. · Illinois v. City of Milwaukee · Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nder Section 9-403(1) the secured party does not bear the risk that the filing officer will not properly perform his duties: under that Section the secured party has complied with the filing requirements when he presents his financing statement for filing and the filing fee has been tendered or the statement accepted by the filing officer.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Cases from other jurisdictions have consistently held that the secured party does not bear the risk of improper indexing by the filing officer so long as the secured party has not by his own conduct caused the error.” Id. at 397 . (emphasis added).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this article.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.