Naing Tun v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
485 F.3d 1014 · 2007
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey (2007), Hanan v. Mukasey (2008)
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Reno v. Flores · Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc. · Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a showing that the outcome of the proceeding may well have been different had there not been any procedural irregularities.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“For a removal hearing to be fair, the arbiter presiding over the hearing must be neutral and the immigrant must be given the opportunity to fairly present evidence, offer arguments, and develop the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Molina v. Whitaker“The Fifth Amendment's due process clause mandates that removal hearings be fundamentally fair.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Molina v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.