Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 F.3d 206 - Aleman

Aleman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2020

6 district · 2 state decisions

90200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Runyon v. McCrary · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Statement of equal rights All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other. (b) "Make and enforce contracts" defined For purposes of this section, the term "make and enforce contracts" includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship. (c) Protection against impairment The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It [is] an unlawful employment practice for an employer ... to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “For the purposes of implementation of [Title VII], a Native Corporation ... or affiliates [of] which the Native Corporation owns [at least 25 percent] shall be within the class of entities excluded from the definition of “employer” [in Title VII].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.