Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

485 F. App'x 622

Brooks v. Mabus

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-10-15

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Decided 2012-10-15

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Katherine W. Brooks appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in her civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-34 (West 2008 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated *623by the district court. Brooks v. Mabus, No. 2:11-cv-00320-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2 & 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/485/fappx/622 · .json · Public domain