Baughman v. Bolinger’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Up until [1977] plaintiff enjoyed the consortium of her husband; after that time she alleges this consortium was lost to her. To hold that the statute of limitations governing her right to sue for loss of consortium was running during years in which she fully enjoyed that consortium would be to exalt fiction and avoid undeniable reality.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 107 Wash. 2d 761 - Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.

2. “* * * “(D) For an injury to the rights of the plaintiff not arising on contract * * *.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 13 Ohio App. 3d 7 - Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.