Van Kruiningen v. PLAN B, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1161 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp. · Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from the policy underlying their claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.