Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 P3D 174 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Arnett · State v. Williams · Scaife v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Issues not briefed are deemed waived or abandoned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Excusable neglect is a procedural standard that permits a defendant to seek to withdraw a plea out of time. Manifest injustice is the substantive standard used to determine whether a motion to withdraw a plea should be granted or denied. The procedural timeliness fork-in-the-road comes first along this particular analytical path. In other words, if a motion to withdraw a plea is filed outside the one-year time limitation, courts must decide whether a defendant has shown excusable neglect before reaching the question of whether manifest injustice requires that a defendant be permitted to withdraw a plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “only upon an additional, affirmative showing of excusable neglect by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.