Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 So. 2d 1201 - Ex Parte State

485 So. 2d 1201 - Ex Parte State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2015

5 state decisions

301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · 396 So. 2d 645 - Beck v. State · Hance v. Zant · Granviel v. Estelle · 482 So. 2d 1241 - Ex Parte Whisenhant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “remand for a new sentencing hearing is an appropriate decree on appeal if error is found in the sentencing phase but not in the guilt-finding phase.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Only a new sentence proceeding is required on remand to the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.