Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 So. 2d 1380 - Van Horn v. State

485 So. 2d 1380 - Van Horn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2006

6 state decisions

30198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Dobbert v. Florida · Kring v. State of Missouri · 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones · 478 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “WHETHER ALL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AMENDMENTS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED PROCEDURAL IN NATURE SO THAT GUIDELINES AS MOST RECENTLY AMENDED SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING WITHOUT REGARD TO THE EX POST FACTO DOCTRINE.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.