485 So. 2d 161 - State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Michigan v. Mosley · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) The witness's opportunity to view the criminal at the time of the crime; 2) The degree of attention paid by the witness during the commission of the crime; 3) The accuracy of any prior description; 4) The level of certainty demonstrated at confrontation; and 5) The time between the crime and the confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Patrick“IDENTIFICATION Defendant's last argument is that the trial court erred in ruling that the identification procedure used was not conducive to irreparable misidentification. A defendant attempting to suppress an identification must prove two things: (1) that the identification was”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Colvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.