Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 So. 2d 351 - Crowe v. State

485 So. 2d 351 - Crowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably 710 So. 2d 1276 - Williams v. State (1996), Henderson v. State (1990)

36 state decisions

2401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Neil v. Biggers · Rhode Island v. Innis · Furman v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'It is a well settled rule of law in Alabama that a statement made subsequent to arrest is prima facie involuntary and inadmissible at trial, and the state must demonstrate voluntariness and a Miranda [ v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)] predicate in order to gain admission of the statement.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]ince the jury had no role in sentencing at common law, no such role is required by the original or any subsequent embodiment of the inviolability clause. Therefore, the advisory nature of the jury's sentence verdict under § 13A-5-46 , Code of Alabama (1975), is not violative of Article I, Section 11.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]hat the right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.