485 So. 2d 827 - Hankey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 509 So. 2d 281 - State v. Rousseau (1987), 498 So. 2d 1249 - Casteel v. State (1986)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · 476 So. 2d 161 - State v. Young · 458 So. 2d 42 - Davis v. State · 469 So. 2d 179 - Steiner v. State · 455 So. 2d 586 - Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Economic hardship on the victim can never constitute a clear and convincing reason to support departure.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“description. In Hankey , the Supreme Court pointed out that the guidelines do not explicitly prohibit departure in a burglary case where breach of trust is involved and that a breach of trust is not an inherent component of the crime of burglary. Adapting this same reasoning to the case at bar, the guidelines do not explicitly prohibit departure so far as the ringleader in a drug trafficking case is concerned. Nor is his status as the leader of this criminal enterprise an inherent component of it. As a consequence, we conclude that being”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.