485 So. 2d 836 - Sutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. Hance Construction Co. · 478 So. 2d 842 - Ehrenshaft v. State · 475 So. 2d 1031 - Edwins v. State · 480 So. 2d 160 - Proctor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]uthorizes the trial court upon revocation of probation to increase a defendant's sentence to the next higher guidelines cell without explanation, but precludes an increase of the sentence beyond one guidelines cell unless the court states clear and convincing reasons for such departure other than the fact that the defendant violated probation. (emphasis supplied).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.