Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 S.W.2d 424 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably State v. McMillin (1990), Wilson v. State (1991)

32 state decisions

21019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States · Crosswhite v. State · State v. Mountjoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant should be misled or be induced to plead guilty by fraud or mistake, by misapprehension, fear, persuasion, or the holding out of hopes which prove to be false or ill founded, he should be permitted to withdraw his plea. The law favors a trial on its merits. The material inquiry is: Was the defendant misled, or under a misapprehension, at the time he entered his plea of guilty? A guilty plea induced by a mistaken belief that a binding plea agreement has been made is invalid whether the defendant is misled by his own attorney, the prosecuting attorney, or by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . The failure of the trial court to' follow the recommendations of the prosecuting attorney in this case does not indicate a ‘manifest injustice’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.