Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 485 U.S. 914 - McQuillen v. Wisconsin Education Association Council Et Al.

McQuillen v. Wisconsin Education Association Council Et Al.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

204
cited by 204 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

66 federal appellate · 18 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 204 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989), Cerrato v. San Francisco Community College District (1994)

66 federal appellate · 18 district · 16 state decisions

16001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Cryts v. French · City of Long Beach v. Southwest Aircraft Services, Inc. · Carnegie v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 204 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not enough for an employee to show that an employer harbored some discriminatory motivation. Rather, the employee must establish that the discriminatory motivation was a determining factor in the challenged employment decision in that the employee would have received the job absent the discriminatory motivation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.