In re Brunson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 102 · 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 2075
Relies on Internal Revenue Service v. Taylor · In Re Armstrong · Padilla v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Padilla) · Lindsey v. Prive Corp. · In Re Sacko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(D) If the holder of a claim fails to provide any information required by this subdivision (c), the court may, after notice and hearing, take either or both of the following actions: (i) preclude the holder from presenting the omitted information, in any form, as evidence in any contested matter or adversary proceeding in the case, unless the court determines that the failure was substantially justified or is harmless; or (ii) award other appropriate relief, including reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees caused by the failure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Davenport“When a claim, or an interest in property of the debtor securing the claim, is based on a writing, the original or a duplicate shall be filed with the proof of claim. If the writing has been lost or destroyed, a statement of the circumstances of the loss or destruction shall be filed with the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Crutchfield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.