Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

486 F.2d 1043

Docket No. 73-1201.

Jose Vasquez, Individually, Etc., Etc. v. Raymond W. Vowell, Etc.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-11-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1973

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1351 (§ 1401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1973-11-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stanley Dalton Wright, Melvin N. Eichelbaum, Miles H. Appleberry, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

John L. Hill, Atty. Gen. of Tex., Pat Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert W. Gauss, Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The central question on this appeal (Does a State law which requires that welfare payments to disabled or mentally incompetent minors be made to a court appointed guardian in the absence of legal emancipation of the minor contravene the Social Security Act and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution?) has been rendered moot by the enactment of Texas Statute, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. Art. 5923b (Supp. 1973), which established eighteen years of age as the legal age in Texas. The federal program involved, Aid to the Permanent and Totally Disabled, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1351 et seq., is only available to "needy individuals eighteen years of age and older who are permanently and totally disabled." The question presented this Court concerning Texas' practices in relation to minor recipients under the Act is rendered moot since Texas no longer has any minor recipients. Accordingly the appeal is

¶2

Dismissed.

/486/f2d/1043 · .json · Public domain