Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 F.2d 229 - United States v. Walling

United States v. Walling’s Empirical Analysis

486 F.2d 229 · 1973

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
7
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Adams v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of offering Swink's extrajudicial statements through Fisher was not to prove the truth of that which Swink had observed, but to demonstrate those circumstances which served as a foundation for Fisher's own observations and actions immediately prior to and during the detention of the Cadillac.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.