Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 F.2d 76 - Dale v. Hahn

Dale v. Hahn’s Empirical Analysis

486 F.2d 76 · 1973

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 1991

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

100197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Chaloner v. Sherman · Dale v. Hahn · In re Certification of Coates · Coates v. Walters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The premise underlying that finding is that there may be situations in which physical service of process will not constitute adequate notice. We are satisfied that such a premise is supported by the cases." 486 F.2d at 78 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. National Indemnity Corp. v. Otsus · 188 Ill. App. 3d 1068 - In Re App. of County Collector
  2. “indicated either that appellee had not been served with notice of the proceeding at all, or that `it was handed to her in circumstances where its meaning did not get through to her.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 188 Ill. App. 3d 1068 - In Re App. of County Collector
  3. “reasonably calculated under all the circumstances, to apprise (him) of the pendency of the action and afford (him) an opportunity to present (his) objections.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Rud v. Dahl

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.