Onepoint Solutions, LLC v. Borchert’s Empirical Analysis
486 F.3d 342 · 2007
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Hastings v. Wilson (2008), Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. Wyeth (2010)
16 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1367 (§ 303 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P. · Simon Zunamon v. W. G. Brown, J. P. Brown, Sr., and J. E. (Doc) Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exists where no defendant holds citizenship in the same state where any plaintiff holds citizenship.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires an amount in controversy greater than $75,000 and complete diversity of citizenship among the litigants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.