Harbin v. Fsb’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Johnson v. De Grandy · Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc. · Schwartz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The Court shall confirm a plan only if all of the following requirements are met: (11) Confirmation of the plan is not likely to be followed by the liquidation, or the need for further financial reorganization, of the debtor or any successor to the debtor under the plan, unless such liquidation or reorganization is proposed in the plan.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a bankruptcy court cannot adequately determine a plan's feasibility for purposes of section 1129(a)(11) without evaluating whether a potential future judgment may affect the debtor's ability to implement its plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Wr Grace & Co.“could significantly affect the plan's feasibility in the future.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Wr Grace & Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.