Jarvis v. K2 Inc K-2’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2025
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants · Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co. · Frank Music Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. · On Davis v. Gap, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unable to exploit it because the new material is inextricably intermingled with the underlying material”). . See 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 3.07[A][1] (rejecting as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“objective considerations of market value”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.