Matthews v. Ishee’s Empirical Analysis
486 F.3d 883 · 2007
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (2012), Bell v. Bell (2008)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Coleman v. Thompson · Giglio v. United States · Murray v. Carrier · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen the information is readily available to the defense from another source, there simply is nothing for the government to `disclose.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a]n application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim— (1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“unavoidably prevented from the discovery of the evidence upon which he must rely,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Stojetz v. Ishee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.