Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

486 Mich. 1071

784 N.W.2d 204

Docket Docket No. 140841. COA No. 292866.

In Re Cw

In re CW, BW, and DW, Minors. CW, BW, and DW, Appellees, and Valeriu Martin and Karen Martin, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Department of Human Services, Respondent-Appellee.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2010.

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2010-07-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-07-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

Order

¶2By order of May 12, 2010, respondent Department of Human Services was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the motions for extension of time to answer and for leave to file brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The answer having been received, as well as a statement from the children's lawyer-guardian ad litem, the application for leave to appeal is again considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

/486/mich/1071 · .json · Public domain