Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 NE2D 497 - Correll v. State

Correll v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bixler v. State · Freed v. State · Graham v. State · Watkins v. State · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[Correll] escaped from the Indiana State Farm on January 26, 1983. Police officers discovered [Correll's] prison clothes in the basement of a house belonging to Donald Blue located one and one quarter (1%) miles from the State Farm. Blue's house was broken into and clothes, food, and a shotgun were taken. A chair was found overlooking the house trailer of Mary Jo Kellam, located across the street from Blue's house. Kellam arrived home from work at about 1:00 a.m. that night. Shortly thereafter [Correll], armed with the stolen shotgun, broke into Kellam's trailer and demanded beer and a ride to Indianapolis. At Indianapolis, while the temperature was below freezing, [Correll] forced Kellam into the trunk of the car, from which she eventually escaped."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[Elxert control over property' means to obtain, take, carry, drive, lead away, conceal, abandon, sell, convey, encumber or possess property, or to secure, transfer, or extend a right to property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “At gunpoint [the defendant] forced Kellam to drive him over 100 miles in her car. Clearly he exerted control over her property....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.