Bergmann v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2016
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Palace Bar, Inc. v. Fearnot · Bradberry v. State · United States v. Kampiles · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Parents are responsible for the care and keeping of their children. This serious obligation has long been imposed upon them by our common and statutory law. The doctrine of necessaries long has imposed upon parents the legal obligation and duty to provide support and education for their children”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]n act of omission is an offense only if the defendant has a statutory, common law, or contractual duty to perform the act and 'voluntarily' engages in the omission which constitutes the breach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. Barber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.