State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Russell · State v. Austin · State v. Sorenson · State v. Fritsche
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant’s probation was granted on condition that the [treatment] program be available. The sentencing court was within its discretion in revoking appellant’s probation where the facilities contemplated in the sentencing alternative became unavailable. Any other rule might force sentencing judges to be unreasonably cautious in ordering probation, lest the probation plan fall through, as it did here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morrow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.