Haisley v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2010
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Love v. State · Ferrell v. Baxter · Lewis v. State · Crawford v. Rogers · Maddocks v. Bennett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Maddocks , we reaffirmed our liberal view favoring the admission of expert testimony if based upon sufficient facts and if the trial judge believes that the jury could receive ‘appreciable assistance’ from it. In such cases, a ruling admitting expert testimony . . . will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown.” (Footnote omitted.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the weight to be accorded to an expert's opinion is, for all practical purposes, exclusively within the province of the jurors as triers of the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tush v. Pharr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.