Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 P.3d 591 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State v. Keel · State v. Ruff · State v. Dickey · Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of stare decisis provides that 'points of law established by a court are generally followed by the same court and courts of lower rank in later cases in which the same legal issue is raised.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[P]oints of law established by a court are generally followed by the same court and courts of lower rank in later cases in which the same legal issue is raised.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'While "stare decisis is not an inexorable command,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.