Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 Pa. 102 - Commonwealth v. Musi

Commonwealth v. Musi’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

169
cited by 169 later decisions
5
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

166 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 169 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Grant (2002), Commonwealth v. White (1995)

166 state decisions

1100197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · United States v. Calandra · Dunaway v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A rule of exclusion is properly employed where the objection goes to the question of the reliability of the challenged evidence ... or reflects intolerable government conduct which is widespread and cannot otherwise be controlled.” Commonwealth v. Musi, 486 Pa. 102, 115 , 404 A.2d 378, 385 (1979).”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is by now axiomatic that the test for evaluating a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is whether the record supports a conclusion that the particular course chosen by counsel had some reasonable basis designed to effectuate his client’s interest. . . . If a reasonable basis for counsel’s trial strategy decision exists, that decision is imputed to the client.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The concept of evaluating the police operation as a collective function as opposed to an individual one is not new. For instance, we have held that it is unnecessary for an arresting officer to have knowledge of the information which supported the probable cause of a warrantless arrest, provided that the officer issuing the order to arrest had sufficient information to act. Commonwealth v. Kenney, 449 Pa. 562, 566-567 , 297 A.2d 794, 796 (1972). See also Commonwealth v. Whitson, 461 Pa. 101 , 334 A.2d 653 (1975). Here, the officer supplying the information for the affidavit possessed the requisite information to satisfy the probable cause requirements. The fact that he delegated the responsibility of placing this information in affidavit form and the securing of the warrant from the issuing authority is of no consequence, where the affidavit accurately reflects the information possessed by the officer and that information satisfies the probable cause requirement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.