Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 So. 2d 101 - State v. Brenner

486 So. 2d 101 - State v. Brenner’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 805 So. 2d 166 - State v. Weaver (2002), 495 So. 2d 1306 - State v. Griffin (1986)

43 state decisions

1901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · Lambert v. People of the State of California · Benjamin v. United States · Bowers v. State · State v. Rones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Criminal negligence exists when, although neither specific nor general criminal intent is present, there is such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"A. Cruelty to the infirm is the intentional or criminally negligent mistreatment or neglect whereby unjustifiable pain or suffering is caused a person who is a resident of a nursing home, mental retardation facility, mental health facility, hospital or other residential facility required to be licensed or operated under the laws of this state or established by the laws of this state."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Unjustifiable is a term of limitation intended to distinguish that pain and suffering which is an inevitable consequence of care and treatment from that which is not justified by medical needs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.