Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 SO2D 1209 - Henry v. State

Henry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Blue v. State (1996), 606 So. 2d 1015 - Abram v. State (1992)

26 state decisions

1201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) reasonable cause to believe a felony has been committed; and (2) reasonable cause to believe that the person proposed to be arrested is the one who committed it.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If it appears from the facts set forth separately in writing in or with the complaint and any supporting affidavits or supplemental sworn testimony, that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the defendant committed it, a warrant for the arrest of the defendant shall be issued to any person authorized by law to execute it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “as a matter of common sense, the coercive impact of incarceration may dissipate with time”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.