Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 So. 2d 1247 - McCray v. State

486 So. 2d 1247 - McCray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 749 So. 2d 110 - Floyd v. City of Crystal Springs (1999), Juarez v. State (1988)

43 state decisions

1701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific and articulable facts,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Conspiracy is a combination of two or more persons to accomplish an unlawful purpose or to accomplish a lawful purpose unlawfully, the persons agreeing in order to form the conspiracy. The offense is complete without showing an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Norman v. State, 381 So.2d 1024 (Miss. 1980); Moore v. State, 290 So.2d 603 (Miss. 1974); Pickett v. State, 139 Miss. 529 , 104 So. 358 (1925). * * * * * * There must be recognition on the part of the conspirators that they are entering into a common plan and knowingly intend to further its common purpose. McDonald v. State, 454 So.2d 488 (Miss. 1984). If there is an agreement, then knowledge of that agreement follows. The agreement need not be formal or express, but may be inferred from the circumstances, particularly by declarations, acts, and conduct of the alleged conspirators.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.