Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 So. 2d 1356 - Morgan v. State

486 So. 2d 1356 - Morgan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2019

22 state decisions

701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 245 So. 2d 225 - State v. Ashby · 376 So. 2d 382 - Brown v. State · 420 So. 2d 639 - Finney v. State · 377 So. 2d 17 - Baker v. State · State v. Carr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n issue is dispositive only if, regardless of whether the appellate court affirms or reverses the lower court's decision, there will be no trial of the case.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The practice of allowing an appeal after a plea of nolo contendere is grounded upon the belief that "it expedites resolution of the controversy and narrows the issue to be resolved." [footnote omitted] These purposes are poorly served and, indeed, thwarted when a defendant is permitted to appeal nondispositive pretrial rulings. Instead of expediting resolution of the controversy, the procedure prolongs litigation by sanctioning, in effect, an interlocutory appeal. Because of the nondispositive nature of the appeal, the defendant faces the prospect of a trial even if he prevails on appeal. The inevitable is not avoided but merely postponed, thus further burdening the already severely taxed resources of our courts. The more logical and efficient procedure to follow in this situation is to proceed to trial and fully ventilate all of the issues. In this way the matter will reach the appellate court in a familiar posture and with a full record upon which to base an intelligent decision. [footnote omitted]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “an Ashby nolo plea is permissible only when the legal issue to be determined on appeal is dispositive of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.