Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 So. 2d 500 - State v. Holman

486 So. 2d 500 - State v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2016

24 state decisions

801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Butler · 56 Ala. App. 704 - English v. State · 49 Ala. App. 623 - Blow v. State · English v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The mere subjective beliefs or expectations of a defendant as to the length of sentence to be imposed, unsupported by any promise from the State or indications by the court, are insufficient and unavailing to set aside a guilty plea as unknowingly or involuntarily made.' State v. Holman, 486 So.2d 500 , 503 (Ala. 1986)."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of the rule allowing a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea when the trial judge refuses to carry out an agreement reached between the prosecutor (or the trial judge) and defense counsel is to insure that such a plea is made voluntarily, which necessarily requires that it be made with full knowledge of the attendant consequences.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`THE COURT: At your lawyer's request, I am going to defer sentencing over to June the 15th.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.