Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 So. 2d 54 - Tobey v. State

486 So. 2d 54 - Tobey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2012

3 state decisions

101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 462 So. 2d 1105 - Dumas v. State · 457 So. 2d 1084 - Ryan v. State · 478 So. 2d 1155 - Marrero v. State · 473 So. 2d 734 - Bell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he predicate questions to impeachment must be asked in good faith, that is, with the intent and ability to later prove (if it is not admitted) that the witness gave some statement inconsistent with his or her present testimony. The reason that such proof must be forthcoming is because the predicate question — e.g., “Didn’t you tell me ... ?” or “Didn’t you say to so-and-so” — is itself testimonial, that is, the question suggests that there is a witness who can testify that such a statement was made. When this suggested witness is not actually called to give the impeaching testimony under oath, all that remains before the jury is the suggestion — from the question — that the statement was made. When that occurs, the conclusion that must be drawn is that the question was not asked in good faith, and that the attorney’s purpose was to bring before the jury inadmissi ble and unsworn evidence in the form of his questions to a witness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.