¶1The defendant’s convictions are affirmed because the suggested trial errors are harmless beyond any reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio (Fla.1985) (Case No. 65,490, opinion filed August 29, 1985). We reverse the sentence in part and direct that the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences imposed on Counts II and III of the indictment be made to run concurrently. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983).
¶2Conviction affirmed; sentence reversed in part with directions.