¶1Affirmed. State v. Coffey, 212 So.2d 632 (Fla.1968); State v. T.L.W., 457 So.2d 566 (Fla.2d DCA 1984); Adams v. State, 448 So.2d 1201 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); Grala v. State, 414 So.2d 621 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Elder v. Robert J. Ackerman, Inc., 362 So.2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Interest of B.S. v. State, 320 So.2d 459 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).
486 So. 2d 689
Grindle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 15, 1986
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-04-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1987
1 state decisions
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 212 So. 2d 632 - State v. Coffey · 414 So. 2d 621 - Grala v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1986-04-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →