Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

486 So. 2d 69

486 So.2d 69

11 Fla.L.Weekly 834

Docket No. 85-1018.

Thomas v. State

Lindsey Lee THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-04-09

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1991

7 state decisions

Relies on 444 So. 2d 947 - Jenkins v. State · 458 So. 2d 396 - Walker v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Penny H. Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Reversed. At sentencing the trial court imposed a public defender's fee and advised appellant that he could contest the fee at a later date. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in imposing the fee without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to its imposition. We agree. Section 27.56(7), Florida Statutes (1985) permits the trial court to assess a defendant for the value of the services of his public defender after adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard and offer objections. In Jenkins v. State,444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984), our Supreme Court held *70 that assessment of costs was not appropriate where there was no prior notice given to the defendant that costs would be imposed against him at the sentencing hearing. The First District later held in Walker v. State,458 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) that an assessment made in open court on the day of the sentencing hearing did not comport with the notice requirement of the statute. We strike the fee and remand this matter to the trial court without prejudice to the State to reassess the fee upon proper notice and hearing.

¶5REVERSED and REMANDED.

¶6LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

/486/so2d/69 · .json · Public domain