DeLuna v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1973
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tinsley v. State · Morris v. State · Ward v. State · Larkin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We view the record sufficient to reflect the fair market value of the lawn mower [cigarettes] in question was over the value of $50.00 as alleged’ in the indictment. This court has held that if the manner of proving value did not meet with the approval of the defendant, it was incumbent upon him to voice his objection at the time of the introduction of the testimony. [citations omitted] No such objection was made nor was the probative value of the testimony relating to value questioned in the trial court. We conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict finding appellant guilty of felony theft [shoplifting].””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curtis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.