Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 SW2D 412 - State v. Lee

State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 1996 · most notably State v. Granberry (1975), State v. Hamell (1977)

33 state decisions

220197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reese · State v. Shilkett · State v. Holbert · State v. Jones · State v. Spray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]roof of the commission of separate and distinct crimes generally is not admissible unless proof thereof has a legitimate tendency to establish the defendant's guilt of the particular charge for which he is on trial. If improperly related to the cause on trial, testimony of other crimes for which defendant may be guilty violates his right to be fairly tried on the offense for which he is charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There is nothing to indicate that the alleged bombings had any connection with or relation to the charge of murder for which defendant was on trial. Any such alleged specific crimes were offenses wholly separate and distinct from the offense with which defendant was charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The practice of seeking to obtain an advantage in a trial of a case by injecting therein unfair insinuations should have the severest condemnation and suffer the most disastrous result permissible under the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.