Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 486 U.S. 356 - Maynard v. Cartwright

Maynard v. Cartwright’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2,500
cited by 2,500 later decisions
59
cited 59 times by the Supreme Court
43
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

644 federal appellate · 103 district · 1,104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,500 later decisions (59 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2025 · most notably Ring v. Arizona (2002), Walton v. Arizona (1990)

644 federal appellate · 103 district · 1,104 state decisions — followed in 43 states

1.4k019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCartwright v. Maynard (from Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia · Proffitt v. Florida · Godfrey v. Georgia

Cited together with Godfrey v. Georgia · Strickland v. Washington · Clemons v. Mississippi · Zant v. Stephens · Lockett v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,500 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel,”
    95 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Vagueness challenges to statutes not threatening First Amendment interests are examined in light of the facts of the case at hand; the statute is judged on an as-applied basis.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he channeling and limiting of the sentencer's discretion in imposing the death penalty is a fundamental constitutional requirement for sufficiently minimizing the risk of wholly arbitrary and capricious action.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.