In re Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 26 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 2002 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 26 U.S.C. § 529
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Schwab v. Reilly · Mayer v. Quy Van Nguyen · Grabenhofer v. Garrett · In re Orton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The first category of exemptions allows debtors to exempt items in full, regardless of value. These exemptions, located in subsections (6), (7), (8), (9), (11) and (12) of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1C-1601 and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-362 , preserve a debtor’s interest in the item or property itself, irrespective of the value assigned by the debtor .... The second category, by contrast, allows debtors to exempt an interest in value up to a specified monetary amount in the particular item, asset or property described. Subsections (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (10) of N.C. Gen. Stat. § lC-1601(a) provide debtors with a limited interest exemption, which allows them to exempt their monetary interest therein as opposed to the property itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.